Harrisville (Queensland) – E.coli
 
11/3/19: Harrisville (Queensland) – E,coli
 
The non-compliance was a detection of E. coli from a routine sample taken on 11/03/2019 at SP447. 59MPN E. coli organisms per 100mL was detected. Follow up samples exhibited no continued presence of E. coli.
 
2018/19 Urban Utilities Drinkiing Water Quality Management Plan Report
 
“E.coli
 

Thermotolerant coliforms are a sub-group of coliforms that are able to grow at 44.5 ± 0.2°C. E. coli is the most common thermotolerant coliform present in faeces and is regarded as the most specific indicator of recent faecal contamination because generally it is not capable of growth in the environment. In contrast, some other thermotolerant coliforms (including strains of Klebsiella, Citrobacter and Enterobacter) are able to grow in the environment and their presence is not necessarily related to faecal contamination. While tests for thermotolerant coliforms can be simpler than for E. coli, E. coli is considered a superior indicator for detecting faecal contamination…” ADWG

11/3/19: Harrisville (Queensland) – E.coli

Harrisville (Queensland) – E.coli
11/3/19: Harrisville (Queensland) – E,coli
The non-compliance was a detection of E. coli from a routine sample taken on 11/03/2019 at SP447. 59MPN E. coli organisms per 100mL was detected. Follow up samples exhibited no continued presence of E. coli.
2018/19 Urban Utilities Drinkiing Water Quality Management Plan Report
“E.coli

Thermotolerant coliforms are a sub-group of coliforms that are able to grow at 44.5 ± 0.2°C. E. coli is the most common thermotolerant coliform present in faeces and is regarded as the most specific indicator of recent faecal contamination because generally it is not capable of growth in the environment. In contrast, some other thermotolerant coliforms (including strains of Klebsiella, Citrobacter and Enterobacter) are able to grow in the environment and their presence is not necessarily related to faecal contamination. While tests for thermotolerant coliforms can be simpler than for E. coli, E. coli is considered a superior indicator for detecting faecal contamination…” ADWG