2007/13 + 2020/21 – Bright (Victoria) – E.coli, Aluminium, Iron, Colour, Manganese, Turbidity, Taste and Odour

Bright (Victoria): E.coli
29/10/07: Bright & Wandiligong. E.coli detection (21 orgs/100ml). Additional chlorine dosed to affected area. Retest was clear.
(North East Water Water Quality Report 2007/08)

“Coliforms are Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, rod-shaped bacteria that are capable of aerobic and facultative anaerobic growth in the presence of bile salts or other surface active agents with similar growth-inhibiting properties. They are found in large numbers in the faeces of humans and other warm-blooded animals, but many species also occur in the environment.

Thermotolerant coliforms are a sub-group of coliforms that are able to grow at 44.5 ± 0.2°C. E. coli is the most common thermotolerant coliform present in faeces and is regarded as the most specific indicator of recent faecal contamination because generally it is not capable of growth in the environment. In contrast, some other thermotolerant coliforms (including strains of Klebsiella, Citrobacter and Enterobacter) are able to grow in the environment and their presence is not necessarily related to faecal contamination. While tests for thermotolerant coliforms can be simpler than for E. coli, E. coli is considered a superior indicator for detecting faecal contamination…” ADWG 2011

Bright (Victoria) – Aluminium

2020/21: Bright (Victoria) Aluminium 2.8mg/L (max), 0.25mg/L (av.)
A routine sample collected from a customer sample tap in the Bright sampling locality returned an  aluminium result of 2.8 mg/L in May 2021. The sample also contained elevated turbidity (8.2 NTU), iron and manganese that were not representative of the water supply. An operator attended the customer  sample tap and flushed following the notification of elevated turbidity on 17 May 2021 and again on the  21 May following the notification of elevated aluminium. The elevated turbidity was above the ADWG  aesthetic guideline value but did not impact on compliance under the Regulations. The cause of the  elevated aluminium result is likely related to sample contamination from sediment build up at the sample  tap.

According to the ADWG, no health guideline has been adopted for Aluminium, but that the issue is still open to review. Aluminium can come from natural geological sources or from the use of aluminium salts as coagulants in water treatment plants. According to the ADWG “A well-operated water filtration plant (even using aluminium as a flocculant) can achieve aluminium concentrations in the finished water of less than 0.1 mg/L.

The most common form of aluminium in water treatment plants is Aluminium Sulfate (Alum). Alum can be supplied as a bulk liquid or in granular form. It is used at water treatment plants as a coagulant to remove turbidity, microorganisms, organic matter and inorganic chemicals. If water is particularly dirty an Alum dose of as high as 500mg/L could occur. There is also concern that other metals may also exist in refined alum.

While the ADWG mentions that there is considerable evidence that Aluminium is neurotoxic and can pass the gut barrier to accumulate in the blood, leading to a condition called encephalopathy (dialysis dementia) and that Aluminium has been associated with Parkinsonism dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the NHMRC, whilst also acknowledging studies which have linked Aluminium with Alzheimer disease, has not granted Aluminium a NOEL (No Observable Effect Level) due to insufficient and contradictory data. Without a NOEL, a health guideline cannot be established. The NHMRC has also stated that if new information comes to hand, a health guideline may be established in the future.

In communication with Aluminium expert Dr Chris Exley (Professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry
The Birchall Centre, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire UK) in March 2013 regarding high levels of Aluminium detected in the South Western Victorian town of Hamilton
“It is my opinion that any value above 0.5 mg/L is totally unacceptable and a potential health risk. Where such values are maintained over days, weeks or even months, as indeed is indicated by the data you sent to me, these represent a significant health risk to all consumers. While consumers may not experience any short term health effects the result of longer term exposure to elevated levels of aluminium in potable waters may be a significant increase in the body burden of aluminium in these individuals. This artificially increased body burden will not return to ‘normal’ levels when the Al content of the potable water returns to normal but will act as a new platform level from which the Al body burden will continue to increase with age.

Bright –  Victoria – Iron

2007/08: Bright (Victoria)  – Iron 0.83mg/L (Highest level only)

2008/09: Bright (Victoria)  – Iron 3.7mg/L (Highest level only)

2020/21: Bright (Victoria) – Iron 0.49mg/L (max)

Based on aesthetic considerations (precipitation of iron from solution and taste),
the concentration of iron in drinking water should not exceed 0.3 mg/L.
No health-based guideline value has been set for iron.

Iron has a taste threshold of about 0.3 mg/L in water, and becomes objectionable above 3 mg/L. High iron concentrations give water an undesirable rust-brown appearance and can cause staining of laundry and plumbing fittings, fouling of ion-exchange softeners, and blockages in irrigation systems. Growths of iron bacteria, which concentrate iron, may cause taste and odour problems and lead to pipe restrictions, blockages and corrosion. ADWG 2011

Bright  (Victoria) – Colour

2007/08: Bright (Victoria) – Colour 20 TCU (Highest Level Only)

Based on aesthetic considerations, true colour in drinking water should not exceed 15 HU.

“… Colour is generally related to organic content, and while colour derived from natural sources such as humic and fulvic acids is not a health consideration, chlorination of such water can produce a variety of chlorinated organic compounds as by-products (see Section 6.3.2 on disinfection by-products). If the colour is high at the time of disinfection, then the water should be checked for disinfection by-products. It should be noted, however, that low colour at the time of disinfection does not necessarily mean that the concentration of disinfection by-products will be low…

2008/9 – Bright (Victoria) – Manganese

2008/9 – Bright (Victoria) – Manganese 0.56mg/L (high)

Manganese: ADWG Guidelines 0.5mg/L. ADWG Aesthetic Guideline 0.1mg/L
Manganese is found in the natural environment. Manganese in drinking water above 0.1mg/L can give water an unpleasant taste and stain plumbing fixtures

Bright (Victoria) – Turbidity

5/09/10 – 16/09/10 Bright/ Wandiligong/ Porepunkah Boil Water Notice The raw water source was highly turbid due to heavy rainfall (Sept. floods). As a precaution the BWN was instated to reduce customer risk. Despite the precautionary BWN, drinking water quality remained compliant during the event.

2010/11: Bright Turbidity 8.8NTU

2011/12: Bright Turbidity 53NTU

Bushfires: In late February 2013, over 100 mm of rain fell at the head of the catchment over a short period which caused land slips and a major dirty water event. Turbidity levels of >30,000 NTU were recorded at the Bright offtake and >3,000 NTU a few days later at Wangaratta.

2020/21: Bright Turbidity 8.4 NTU (max), 1.5 NTU (Max 95th percentile retic)

Chlorine-resistant pathogen reduction: Where filtration alone is used as the water treatment
process to address identified risks from Cryptosporidium and Giardia, it is essential
that filtration is optimised and consequently the target for the turbidity of water leaving
individual filters should be less than 0.2 NTU, and should not exceed 0.5 NTU at any time
Disinfection: A turbidity of less than 1 NTU is desirable at the time of disinfection with
chlorine unless a higher value can be validated in a specific context.
Aesthetic: Based on aesthetic considerations, the turbidity should not exceed 5 NTU at the
consumer’s tap.

Bright (Victoria) – Taste & Odour

27 December 2013 (15 days) – Bright, Porepunkah and Wandiligong

Taste and odour present in the Bright water supply system caused repeated customer enquiries. Testing indicated that the naturally occurring compound 2-Methylisoborneol (MIB) was present at high concentrations. The Bright WTP could not effectively remove the compound, so an alternative groundwater source was utilised to dilute the Ovens River source. A media release was issued for Bright, Porepunkah and Wandiligong residents explaining the nature of the taste and odour problem. Additional, broader MIB sampling was conducted to characterise the issue within the Ovens catchment. Powdered activated carbon dosing is an effective means of removing taste and odour compounds from water and will be part of the new Bright WTP which is due to commence construction in 2014-15.